[framework] Creating a debian package for metasploit.
Konrads Smelkovs
konrads.smelkovs at gmail.com
Mon Dec 17 10:27:39 CST 2007
That would be an ideal case.
Make a daily deb builds from snapshots :)
On Dec 17, 2007 6:17 PM, Jay Beale <neutrinoj at gmail.com> wrote:
> What if the Metasploit team published your spec file and instructions
> on the site or even your deb file? The former would let you get the
> advantages below, without requiring Debian/Ubuntu to redistribute
> software.
>
> Hmmmm...if someone had time and inclination, Metasploit might even set
> up a directory to be a deb repository on their web server. That would
> mean that a user had only to add a line to their apt.sources file and
> then could do their apt-get install metasploit3 or such...
>
> - - Jay
>
> On Dec 17, 2007 6:58 AM, Konrads Smelkovs <konrads.smelkovs at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > My reason for wanting a deb is to simplify maintenance and installation,
> so
> > if the deb is built djb daemontools style, i'd be perfectly content.
> Perhaps
> > this could be a solution for a while?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 17, 2007 1:38 PM, Tim Brown <tmb at 65535.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Monday 17 December 2007 10:55:57 gaurav chaturvedi wrote:
> > > > >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=323420
> > > >
> > > > Oh this is sad indeed, but the dual license should be void now since
> > > > MSF dosnt use perl. In any case there should be enough room for
> > > > metasploit under the extra/restricted packages.
> > > > We can package MSF and create our own unoficial repository. If we
> are
> > > > up for it, i volunteer to create the package/maintain this as a
> > > > package.
> > >
> > > From Metasploit Framework License v1.2
> > > (http://www.metasploit.com/projects/Framework/msf3/download.html):
> > >
> > > "3. The license granted in Section 2 is expressly made subject to and
> > > limited by the following restrictions:
> > >
> > > a. You may only distribute, publicly display, and publicly perform
> > > unmodified Software. Without limiting the foregoing, You agree to
> > > maintain (and not supplement, remove, or modify) the same copyright,
> > > trademark notices and disclaimers in the exact wording as released by
> > > Developer. "
> > >
> > > I believe that packaging it for Ubuntu and Debian would violate this
> > clause.
> > > Moreover the restriction breaks Debians free software guidelines
> > > (http://www.debian.org/social_contract, DFSG clauses 3 and 4):
> > >
> > > "3. Derived Works
> > > The license must allow modifications and derived works, and must allow
> > them to
> > > be distributed under the same terms as the license of the original
> > software.
> > >
> > > 4. Integrity of The Author's Source Code
> > > The license may restrict source-code from being distributed in
> modified
> > form
> > > _only_ if the license allows the distribution of patch files with the
> > source
> > > code for the purpose of modifying the program at build time. The
> license
> > must
> > > explicitly permit distribution of software built from modified source
> > code.
> > > The license may require derived works to carry a different name or
> version
> > > number from the original software. (This is a compromise. The Debian
> group
> > > encourages all authors not to restrict any files, source or binary,
> from
> > > being modified.)"
> > >
> > > Ubuntu developers approached Metasploit with regard to getting changes
> > made to
> > > the Metasploit license which would allow version 3 of the framework to
> be
> > > packaged, and the results of this conversation were made available in
> the
> > bug
> > > #102212 filed on launchpad (
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/102212).
> > >
> > > It might be possible to work around it ala make-jpkg but it looks like
> > work to
> > > package it has stalled for now. It would not AFAIK be possible to
> > distribute
> > > legally any .deb of Metasploit Framework v3 as things stand.
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > > NB, I am a Debian maintainer, but I'm not talking as one on this
> occasion
> > -
> > > these are just my personal thoughts :).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tim Brown
> > > <mailto:tmb at 65535.com>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Konrads Smelkovs
> > Applied IT sorcery.
>
--
Konrads Smelkovs
Applied IT sorcery.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://spool.metasploit.com/pipermail/framework/attachments/20071217/8a04d06f/attachment.htm
More information about the framework
mailing list