[framework] db_autopwn: Determining what exploit gained a shell

[H D Moore]

Yup, theres a reason :-) Since this feature can launch modules against 
every type of OS or CPU supported by the framework, we need to pick the 
lowest common denominator for the payload options (bind, reverse).  
Nothing stops us from adding a method of specifying individual payloads 
for every unique OS/CPU combination, but it hasn't been implemented yet. 

-HD

On Saturday 12 May 2007 11:28, nnp wrote:
> Erm... right.... I probably should have mentioned I was talking about
> db_autopwn. As in is there payload besides the -r and the -b options
> that's available through db_autopwn and if there isn't is there a
> reason why there isnt besides nobody getting around to it yet?