[framework] Has anyone seen security tree?
K Tucker
ktucker1022 at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 8 18:47:42 CDT 2007
I have worked with both and metasploit is by far the superior approach. But I certainly support their efforts and hope it keeps developing.
H D Moore <hdm at metasploit.com> wrote: The web interface was modeled after msfweb, and I think they ganked the
icons we used (which we in turn ganked from who knows where). Besides
that, there is no similarity. They use existing, pre-compiled exploits to
fill out the tree, we use explotis designed specifically for the
framework. I prefer our approach for a number of reasons, but its a lot
more work to maintain.
-HD
On Monday 08 October 2007 17:11, Mr Gabriel wrote:
> I had a quick look around this site, and it looks like these guys are
> ripping off metasploit.
>
> Is it a fork of the metasploit project? Or was metasploit a fork of
> exploit tree? This is the site
>
> http://securityforest.com/wiki/index.php/Exploitation_Framework
>
>
>
> *****
> Mr Gabriel
> angelisonline at gmail.com
> BlackBerry Pin 2047D423
---------------------------------
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha!
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://spool.metasploit.com/pipermail/framework/attachments/20071008/270e6de6/attachment.htm
More information about the framework
mailing list